broken image
broken image

EST. 2021

    Apply Here
    • Curriculum
    • Testimonials
    • FAQ
    • …  
      • Curriculum
      • Testimonials
      • FAQ
    broken image
    broken image

    EST. 2021

    • Curriculum
    • Testimonials
    • FAQ
    • …  
      • Curriculum
      • Testimonials
      • FAQ
      Apply Here
      broken image

      The Social Contract (and Democracy)

      by Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1762)

      Watch this clip before you read the text excerpt: 

      Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave than they.

      The family then may be called the first model of political societies: the ruler corresponds to the father, and the people to the children; and all, being born free and equal, alienate their liberty only for their own advantage. 

      What man loses by the social contract is his natural liberty and an unlimited right to everything he tries to get and succeeds in getting; what he gains is civil liberty and the proprietorship of all he possesses. 

      Instead of a renunciation, they have made an advantageous exchange: instead of an uncertain and precarious way of living they have got one that is better and more secure; instead of natural independence they have got liberty, instead of the power to harm others security for themselves...

      On Democracy

      If we take the term in the strict sense, there never has been a real democracy, and there never will be. It is against the natural order for the many to govern and the few to be governed. 

      It is unimaginable that the people should remain continually assembled to devote their time to public affairs, and it is clear that they cannot set up commissions for that purpose without the form of administration being changed.

      This is why a famous writer has made virtue the fundamental principle of Republics; for all these conditions could not exist without virtue.

      It may be added that there is no government so subject to civil wars and intestine agitations as democratic or popular government, because there is none which has so strong and continual a tendency to change to another form, or which demands more vigilance and courage for its maintenance as it is.

      Were there a people of gods, their government would be democratic. So perfect a government is not for men.

      On Censorship and Public Opinion as Law

      As the law is the declaration of the general will, the censorship is the declaration of the public judgment: public opinion is the form of law which the censor administers, and, like the prince, only applies to particular cases.

      From this it follows that the censorship may be useful for the preservation of morality, but can never be so for its restoration.

       

      Previous
      John Locke on Natural Rights
      Next
      Leviathan
       Return to site
      Cookie Use
      We use cookies to improve browsing experience, security, and data collection. By accepting, you agree to the use of cookies for advertising and analytics. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Learn More
      Accept all
      Settings
      Decline All
      Cookie Settings
      Necessary Cookies
      These cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies can’t be switched off.
      Analytics Cookies
      These cookies help us better understand how visitors interact with our website and help us discover errors.
      Preferences Cookies
      These cookies allow the website to remember choices you've made to provide enhanced functionality and personalization.
      Save